Safe consumption spaces cost too much.
Safe consumption spaces actually save tax payers money:
- Read the cost benefit analysis for Vancouver's InSite here.
- Read the cost benefit analysis for a proposed site in Baltimore here.
- Read the cost benefit analysis for a proposed site in San Francisco here.
Below is a chart indicating the current cost in King County for treatment and recovery services and the estimated cost of the proposed SCS:
The studies on supervised consumption sites are flawed.
Studies and articles written about the benefits of safe consumption spaces are peer-reviewed, meaning these articles are written by experts and are reviewed by several other experts in the field before the article is published in the journal in order to ensure the article's accuracy.
Reports written against safe consumption spaces are heavily flawed, not peer-reviewed and often funded by those ideologically opposed to safe consumption spaces. You can read an article about it here.
Vancouver's overdose death rates have risen.
InSite is still saving lives. There has been a tragic increase in Vancouver's overdose death rates recently due to Fentanyl. All of these deaths have occurred outside of InSite and despite an increase in overdose interventions at InSite there has still been zero deaths.
To address the opioid epidemic in Canada and due to the proven success of InSite, there have now been several more safe consumption spaces opened in Vancouver and across Canada.
Supervised consumption spaces make it easier for people to get drugs
Safe consumption spaces do not provide illegal drugs to users or promote drug use in any way. An SCS is a safe and clean place for people to use the drugs they have in the presence of a trained health-care provider.
Have more questions or concerns?
Contact us at the email address below, or through social media anytime!